« Previous | Main | Next »

Walcott Moves up to Veer

Veer is now distributing the fonts of Jason Walcott. There was a time when he could be called a House Industries wannabe, but Walcott's now sporting a substantial library of impressive work, and much of it is unique. He wisely renamed the collection once known at MyFonts as JAW Fonts to Jukebox Type — an appropriate moniker for his retro-americana scripts and kitch. Comparing the MyFonts and Veer pages reveals how a responsible, savvy reseller like Veer can lend credibility and importance to an otherwise buried body of work. Some of the standouts:

  • Feeling nostalgic for Bookman Swash? Try Cavetto.
  • Annabelle is one of the few decent connected scripts that lives in the realm between casual and formal.
  • Southland's caps are lovely, quaint things. This face belongs on a café sign hanging above a tourist sidewalk.
  • Alpengeist makes me think of Disneyland and storybooks.

Thanks to BJ Harvey for the tip.

Posted by Typographica | June 09, 2003 | LINK

Comments

Yes! I previewed this in the latest Veer catalog. Great designs on the fonts. High quality workmanship. Get "Gypsy Switch" from Jukebox as a "One Free Play" for registered Veer users. Highly recommended!

Kojo | Jun 10, 2003 09:27 AM

Annabelle is especially lovely.

This might definately be worth the purchase.


hildebrant

hildebrant | Jun 10, 2003 11:38 AM

I love the new jukebox selection. I usually have a hard time finding good script typefaces to use, these hit the spot. They have a lot of personality. Peregroy is mighty fine too!

Armin | Jun 10, 2003 12:11 PM

Indeed, Armin. I completely overlooked that one. Thanks.

Stephen | Jun 10, 2003 12:15 PM

Seems that Veer has marked up the prices on these as well. Annabelle and Alpengeist were only $20 when they were sold thru MyFonts.com. I wonder if they are exactly the same, or if there have been any enhancements that would justify a 200% increase? Kind of makes me regret not getting some of them soonoer.

Justin | Jun 10, 2003 11:19 PM

Oops, looks like it's time to step in here...

Justin typed: Seems that Veer has marked up the prices on these as well.

I'd just like to clarify that the price increase for Jason's marvelous fonts was a mutual decision, not some unilateral cash grab on Veer's part. We felt that the previous pricing model was undervaluing Jason's library and we wanted to make sure that he was going to get properly compensated for all his hard work - especially as we moved forward marketing and promoting his faces. Yes, it is a comparatively big jump in price. But look again at the fonts. They're worth at least $29 a piece, wouldn't you agree?

Grant Hutchinson | Jun 11, 2003 12:01 PM

Thanks for clarifying that, Grant -- I didn't mean to imply any cash grab on Veer's part, it was just surprising to see the new prices. I agree that Jason's fonts are terrific and that he should be well compensated for his work.

Justin | Jun 11, 2003 12:10 PM

No worries. I just didn't want anyone getting the wrong idea about our intentions.

Grant Hutchinson | Jun 12, 2003 11:37 AM

I need some clients I can purchase these fonts for.

Do you want to be my client? Need a sign for a café next to a tourist sidewalk?


--
Sorry for my not very constructive, critique-less post(s). :)

rolf | Jun 13, 2003 01:38 AM

Just wanted to say that Jason's creativity is incredible. From a totally unbiased observer. Jason's Grandmother.

Mary Walcott | Jul 29, 2003 04:34 PM

What a strange mix. Some faces are good renditions of actual vintage lettering styles. Others are a mixup of influences which gives odd sensations. The latter are a good example of what I defined "naive" typefaces drawn pretty well, as opposed to my commentary on Comic Sans (see the Ban Comic Sans thread).
I wonder if any one of these is actually a pretty faithful digitization of a pre-existing types.
On this topic, a really badly traced/spaced/produced digital typeface exists, based on a wonderful script gem called Dragonwick. It was called Dragon, you used to find it anywhere in freeware archives. I've seen it used so many times in the most inappropriate ways in the last 12 years or so I felt sick.
The peak (at least here in Italy) was reached when I saw a car with its metal-embossed logo set in it!
How uncool? A car logotype (type)set with a SUPER-UGLY digital version of a typeface which otherwise would have been painstakingly good. Give the original drawings of Dragonwick (or a good proof) to Thierry Puyfoulhoux and he'll produce a treasure for you, if you know what I mean.

Claudio Piccinini | Jul 30, 2003 06:54 AM


Post a comment.

Your Name (Required.)


Your Email (Required. Will not be published.)


Your Website (Optional.)




Your Comments


Despaminator
Please enter the letter "n" in the box at left.



GUIDELINES
Please refrain from off-topic banter and personal attacks. Your comment may be edited or removed at the discretion of Typographica editors. Our goal is not to stifle debate but to keep it relevant.

HTML TAGS (Copy, paste, and replace the gray text with your own.)
Bold: <strong>Text</strong>
Italic: <em>Text</em>
Link: <a href="http://url">Linked text</a>
Insert Image: <img src="http://url/image.gif" />
(Please limit image width to 350 pixels.)