« Previous | Main | Next »

Adobe & MM Fonts: Insight From the Inside

For years, many typography professionals have wondered what happened to Adobe’s Multiple Master technology. Others don’t really miss it at all, either because it was too difficult to understand or because they never encountered an MM font (very few were released). Last night, on Typophile, Hrant Papazian put the question to Thomas Phinney of Adobe: “Why did MM fail?”

Reason 1: Lack of support within Adobe

Where MM failed was in the Adobe type group not realizing that they needed to put huge amounts of energy into evangelizing the applications and UI people. So it was a failure of internal marketing.

Reason 2: End Users Didn’t Get On Board

Actually, the MM fonts sold well, but our research showed that most users only used the default instances and never made custom instances. For them, we would have made their lives easier if we sold them separate fonts with nice clear names. ... It was difficult to explain the value proposition to customers. “Yes, I know there are only two font files, but they recombobulate into a couple of dozen fonts, so that’s what you should pay for!” That was not a line that went over very easily, and was not seriously pursued for long. So they were not sold by Adobe at prices that came anywhere near reflecting the work that went into them.

OpenType’s success:

Adobe’s type group learned a lot from the MM experience. We knew that with OpenType we would have to work our rear ends off to explain the benefits to our own application people, and market it heavily internally. We did exactly that, with the result that we had more support for specific features of OpenType when the first fonts shipped, than we got for MM fonts in ten years. ... Finally, it’s true that the advanced features of OpenType for western languages are pretty much an Adobe-only game right now. But this will change within a couple of years. Juergen Kurz (Tim Gill's replacement at Quark) told me at Seybold that QuarkXPress 7 will support both Unicode and OpenType layout goodness.

OpenType is seeing success in another key realm as well; the number of new OpenType font releases from foundries other than Adobe is steadily growing. Typographica listed a few of those in August and we’ll update that list soon.

Posted by Typographica | October 09, 2003 | LINK

Comments

While I have no problem with t.ca blurbs pointing to {T} threads, perhaps instead of commenting here we should all keep the discussion inside the typophile thread itself..

John Butler | Oct 9, 2003 11:39 AM

Prudent call, John. I'll close comments on this item here.

Stephen Coles | Oct 9, 2003 11:46 AM


Post a comment.

Your Name (Required.)


Your Email (Required. Will not be published.)


Your Website (Optional.)




Your Comments


Despaminator
Please enter the letter "h" in the box at left.



GUIDELINES
Please refrain from off-topic banter and personal attacks. Your comment may be edited or removed at the discretion of Typographica editors. Our goal is not to stifle debate but to keep it relevant.

HTML TAGS (Copy, paste, and replace the gray text with your own.)
Bold: <strong>Text</strong>
Italic: <em>Text</em>
Link: <a href="http://url">Linked text</a>
Insert Image: <img src="http://url/image.gif" />
(Please limit image width to 350 pixels.)