- 08.19.10
Making Geometric Type Work
Michael Critz: A great post, Ian. In our studio there’s a great deal of concern about how certain geometric fonts have “fatal flaws.” For in… - 08.17.10
Saul Bass Website and “Hitchcock” Font Are Back
keith morris: The lettering artist that did the lettering for the Saul Bass titles was Art Goodman. … - 08.11.10
Font Spotting the Thank You for Smoking Titles
Viktor Kaganovich: Mindy Marin is Corvinus Skylight. To not have recognized it... … - 07.20.10
Stag
Sye: I love Stag. It's actually almost become my default, although it's taken me a while to get use to it.… - 06.30.10
U&lc: Influencing design and typography
Nick Shinn: The big format was important. I worked in an ad agency at the time, and we'd do posters and big newspaper and tabloid magazin… - 06.28.10
FontBook, 4th Edition
sheema mahmud: I would love to have this book, how could it be possible from where to buy? regards… - 06.27.10
Darka
Meave is One Badass MF | Typography Texas: [...] first heard about him when I saw Darka. I’ve been dreaming of designing a book about heraldry using that font. I … - 06.25.10
Archer
Tiffany: The biggest problem for Archer is going to be breaking away from being typecast. Martha Stewart did (does) a great job of usi… - 05.27.10
Fraktur Mon Amour, 2nd Edition
Chris Lozos: Well written and thoroughly done, Florian. I must admit that I enjoyed the Modern display faces more than you seem to have. T…
New Additions at Enschedé
The Enschedé Font Foundry updates its site, with new 600dpi PDF specimens and the new headline companion to Bram de Does’ Lexicon. This adds one new roman and one new italic weight to the text series’ twenty-four roman and italic weights.
8 Responses
to “New Additions at Enschedé”
Interesting tactic on the 600dpi bitmap specimens. But I don’t get “It is not representative for the quality of printing which will be achieved when using a 600 dpi laserprinter or better.”, at least not for 600. Why not?
hhp
That one stumped me too. Maybe a subtle language barrier somewhere. All I know is the fonts is damn fine.
These PDF files contain 600 dpi bitmap images and…
They just accentuaded the fact, that a Bitmap image at 600 DPI will not give you the same results as a print using Postscript at 600 DPI.
—Jacques
And why not? If they used a good screen-Postscript rendered the results should be identical.
hhp
I was under the impression that 600 dpi was 600 dpi, and a bitmap image rendered succesfully for the size/resolution from vector information would look the same.
Indeed, a rendered image image should be the same. But this is not always the case. The results depend on which driver or programm you use.
My colleague (I work for TEFF) added the remark, because the sample pages are good enough to give you an impression of how the typefaces look like, but they will never be 100 % indentical to the results you get by using the original fonts.
—Jacques
If you use Photoshop for example to render, then you’re right. But if you use a real screen-Postscript renderer, then the bitmap will be identical. I’m not saying it’s worth the trouble though.
Hey, what do you do at TEFF?
hhp
Only few people know, that TEFF is actually designing a lot of high quality typography. Most of the typography we do are dictionaries, bibles and similar. In the recent past TEFF has had several book design awards.
I work as a typeface designer for TEFF. Most of what I do is to support my colleagues, who design the books. This can be the creation, modification, or alteration of typefaces, which are needed for the typographical designs. And I work for foundry projects as well.
—Jacques