<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ordained Ministry of OpenType</title>
	<atom:link href="http://typographica.org/2005/on-typography/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://typographica.org/2005/on-typography/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/</link>
	<description>A journal of typography with a focus on typeface reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Coles</title>
		<link>http://typographica.org/2005/on-typography/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36938</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 03:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.typographica.org/archives/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36938</guid>
		<description>Nathan - it&#039;s a fair question. That ligature is historically found in many serif text faces, but it&#039;s not a common script lig. One of the reasons Alejandro&#039;s faces work well is that the ligatures are usually used to enhance the natural flow of the type, not necessarily for decoration.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan &#8211; it&#8217;s a fair question. That ligature is historically found in many serif text faces, but it&#8217;s not a common script lig. One of the reasons Alejandro&#8217;s faces work well is that the ligatures are usually used to enhance the natural flow of the type, not necessarily for decoration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Myers</title>
		<link>http://typographica.org/2005/on-typography/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36937</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.typographica.org/archives/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36937</guid>
		<description>I hope this won&#039;t be taken as a criticism, but I was surprised not to find a ligature for &quot;sc&quot;, the one with a gratuitious loop over the top.  Deliberate or just forgot?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this won&#8217;t be taken as a criticism, but I was surprised not to find a ligature for &#8220;sc&#8221;, the one with a gratuitious loop over the top.  Deliberate or just forgot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shay</title>
		<link>http://typographica.org/2005/on-typography/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36936</link>
		<dc:creator>Shay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2005 00:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.typographica.org/archives/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36936</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a beautiful, beautiful work. I just wish I had a good reason (or some spare money) to buy it, just so I could play with it. Right now I&#039;m just staring at the PDF, zooming in and out...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a beautiful, beautiful work. I just wish I had a good reason (or some spare money) to buy it, just so I could play with it. Right now I&#8217;m just staring at the PDF, zooming in and out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DANIEL</title>
		<link>http://typographica.org/2005/on-typography/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36935</link>
		<dc:creator>DANIEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.typographica.org/archives/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36935</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the explanation Dirk.

But can a single code point consist of a combination of two or more characters/glyphs  (or is it always a single character/glyph)? Say the classic combination f and i. Could that be a single codepoint that triggers an alternate glyph like the ligature fi?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the explanation Dirk.</p>
<p>But can a single code point consist of a combination of two or more characters/glyphs  (or is it always a single character/glyph)? Say the classic combination f and i. Could that be a single codepoint that triggers an alternate glyph like the ligature fi?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Coles</title>
		<link>http://typographica.org/2005/on-typography/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36934</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 17:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.typographica.org/archives/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36934</guid>
		<description>Thank you!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk Llewelyn</title>
		<link>http://typographica.org/2005/on-typography/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36933</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Llewelyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 08:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.typographica.org/archives/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36933</guid>
		<description>So now they know.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now they know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Coles</title>
		<link>http://typographica.org/2005/on-typography/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36932</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 23:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.typographica.org/archives/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36932</guid>
		<description>See?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk Llewelyn</title>
		<link>http://typographica.org/2005/on-typography/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36931</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Llewelyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.typographica.org/archives/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36931</guid>
		<description>A codepoint is a point in unicode; for the most part this is comparable to a &quot;character&quot; in type-1, except that unicode is a 32bit code (of which only the 16bit ones are currently being allocated), and that it also incorporates symbols and codes for stuff like zero-width-non-joiners, etc. The code2000 font has glyphs for 60000 codepoints (including unofficial ones like Klingon).

A codepoint can be encoded in many encodings, like UTF-8, which may take as little as 1, or as much as 6 bytes to encode one codepoint. This is why it&#039;s handy to refer to codepoints as codepoints and not as characters, doublebytes, or whatever.

Ministry script has many alternate glyphs for single or multiple (automatic ligature) codepoints.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A codepoint is a point in unicode; for the most part this is comparable to a &#8220;character&#8221; in type-1, except that unicode is a 32bit code (of which only the 16bit ones are currently being allocated), and that it also incorporates symbols and codes for stuff like zero-width-non-joiners, etc. The code2000 font has glyphs for 60000 codepoints (including unofficial ones like Klingon).</p>
<p>A codepoint can be encoded in many encodings, like UTF-8, which may take as little as 1, or as much as 6 bytes to encode one codepoint. This is why it&#8217;s handy to refer to codepoints as codepoints and not as characters, doublebytes, or whatever.</p>
<p>Ministry script has many alternate glyphs for single or multiple (automatic ligature) codepoints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://typographica.org/2005/on-typography/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36930</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 09:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.typographica.org/archives/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36930</guid>
		<description>What is a codepoint?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is a codepoint?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marian bantjes</title>
		<link>http://typographica.org/2005/on-typography/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36929</link>
		<dc:creator>marian bantjes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 07:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.typographica.org/archives/ordained-ministry-of-opentype/#comment-36929</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an absolute stunner. Congrats.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an absolute stunner. Congrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.268 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 05:28:27 -->

