Comments on: Arno http://typographica.org/2008/typeface-reviews/arno/ A journal of typography with a focus on typeface reviews. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:23:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Lucia Colella http://typographica.org/2008/typeface-reviews/arno/#comment-37699 Lucia Colella Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:13:42 +0000 http://new.typographica.org/archives/arno-pro-by-robert-slimbach/#comment-37699 I absolutely love Arno. I recently used it for a calendar design - many people asked me what typeface I had used. (You can view it on my AIGA.org profile.) I absolutely love Arno. I recently used it for a calendar design – many people asked me what typeface I had used. (You can view it on my AIGA.org profile.)

]]> By: M Fernandes http://typographica.org/2008/typeface-reviews/arno/#comment-37698 M Fernandes Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:34:51 +0000 http://new.typographica.org/archives/arno-pro-by-robert-slimbach/#comment-37698 After reading about Arno Pro in typographica, I decided to use it for an art catalogue. And it looks great! The artist is really happy with the design, and she even inquired about the font, because she loves the look of Arno Pro. After reading about Arno Pro in typographica, I decided to use it for an art catalogue. And it looks great! The artist is really happy with the design, and she even inquired about the font, because she loves the look of Arno Pro.

]]> By: BlueStreak http://typographica.org/2008/typeface-reviews/arno/#comment-37697 BlueStreak Sun, 10 Aug 2008 01:31:45 +0000 http://new.typographica.org/archives/arno-pro-by-robert-slimbach/#comment-37697 >But one quirk, or so it appears to me... That quirk seems to be due to the software used. Here's a link to the discussion on Typophile regarding this matter: <a href="http://www.typophile.com/node/48059" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.typophile.com/node/48059" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.typophile.com/node/48059" rel="nofollow">http://www.typophile.com/node/48059</a></a></a> >But one quirk, or so it appears to me…

That quirk seems to be due to the software used. Here’s a link to the discussion on Typophile regarding this matter:
http://www.typophile.com/node/48059

]]> By: Doug Barned http://typographica.org/2008/typeface-reviews/arno/#comment-37696 Doug Barned Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:37:53 +0000 http://new.typographica.org/archives/arno-pro-by-robert-slimbach/#comment-37696 Thanks for the review - I have recently fallen in love with this typeface and its good to learn a little more about it. Thanks for the review – I have recently fallen in love with this typeface and its good to learn a little more about it.

]]> By: DThompson http://typographica.org/2008/typeface-reviews/arno/#comment-37695 DThompson Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:32:38 +0000 http://new.typographica.org/archives/arno-pro-by-robert-slimbach/#comment-37695 A beautiful font and incredibly flexible. But one quirk, or so it appears to me: The letter spacing for the combination of upper case T and lower case o (and a few other lower case letters) seems too wide. Side bearings on other standard combinations are ok. Anyone else see this, or am I imagining it? A beautiful font and incredibly flexible.
But one quirk, or so it appears to me:
The letter spacing for the combination of upper case T and lower case o (and a few other lower case letters) seems too wide. Side bearings on other standard combinations are ok.
Anyone else see this, or am I imagining it?

]]> By: Chris Rugen http://typographica.org/2008/typeface-reviews/arno/#comment-37694 Chris Rugen Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:22:22 +0000 http://new.typographica.org/archives/arno-pro-by-robert-slimbach/#comment-37694 How I missed this in CS3, I'll never know. Now I've got a whole new type family to play with. Thanks for pointing this one out, Mark. How I missed this in CS3, I’ll never know. Now I’ve got a whole new type family to play with. Thanks for pointing this one out, Mark.

]]>