<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marlene</title>
	<atom:link href="http://typographica.org/2009/typeface-reviews/marlene/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://typographica.org/2009/typeface-reviews/marlene/</link>
	<description>A journal of typography with a focus on typeface reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:05:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: locksmith</title>
		<link>http://typographica.org/2009/typeface-reviews/marlene/#comment-38546</link>
		<dc:creator>locksmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.typographica.org/?p=5393#comment-38546</guid>
		<description>I guess its Marlene Dietrich inspired. Very german looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess its Marlene Dietrich inspired. Very german looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rory</title>
		<link>http://typographica.org/2009/typeface-reviews/marlene/#comment-38383</link>
		<dc:creator>rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.typographica.org/?p=5393#comment-38383</guid>
		<description>Marlene is a sexy font lady, with amazing curves and a attitude to suit. But dont get to close she, she&#039;ll draw you in and take your heart! Ouch, loving this font!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marlene is a sexy font lady, with amazing curves and a attitude to suit. But dont get to close she, she&#8217;ll draw you in and take your heart! Ouch, loving this font!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: used cars sioux falls</title>
		<link>http://typographica.org/2009/typeface-reviews/marlene/#comment-38259</link>
		<dc:creator>used cars sioux falls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.typographica.org/?p=5393#comment-38259</guid>
		<description>This font looks like a French version of Times New Roman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This font looks like a French version of Times New Roman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Brown</title>
		<link>http://typographica.org/2009/typeface-reviews/marlene/#comment-38184</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 22:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.typographica.org/?p=5393#comment-38184</guid>
		<description>The lowercase roman a is really something. How about that lip on its serif?

The 7 is intriguing. I love the way its outer joint is squared off. Overall it&#039;s a relatively lightweight character, but I don&#039;t quite notice unless I&#039;m looking critically. Funny how it otherwise blends in with the heavier numerals.

&quot;Strong lines that add yet more of a sense of urgency and pace...&quot; – beautiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lowercase roman a is really something. How about that lip on its serif?</p>
<p>The 7 is intriguing. I love the way its outer joint is squared off. Overall it&#8217;s a relatively lightweight character, but I don&#8217;t quite notice unless I&#8217;m looking critically. Funny how it otherwise blends in with the heavier numerals.</p>
<p>&#8220;Strong lines that add yet more of a sense of urgency and pace&#8230;&#8221; – beautiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nora</title>
		<link>http://typographica.org/2009/typeface-reviews/marlene/#comment-38091</link>
		<dc:creator>Nora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.typographica.org/?p=5393#comment-38091</guid>
		<description>This post has been just in time for me ... searching for a book project ... idontknowexactlywhatatypeface ... thank you for leading my view to this tough beauty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post has been just in time for me &#8230; searching for a book project &#8230; idontknowexactlywhatatypeface &#8230; thank you for leading my view to this tough beauty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Inciong</title>
		<link>http://typographica.org/2009/typeface-reviews/marlene/#comment-38080</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Inciong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.typographica.org/?p=5393#comment-38080</guid>
		<description>Among this typeface&#039;s most endearing qualities is its temperance. Djurek&#039;s design is categorically Modern; the letterforms are brisk and resolute yet they maintain the subtle contrast associated with a broad-nib pen. As a distant student of the writing-centered perspective propagated by Gerrit Noordzij in the Hague, as well as his written account of pointed pen construction as being &#039;altogether without orientation&#039;*, I have tended to perceive the Modern style as frigid and undisciplined. Marlene sheds that acidulousness by exhibiting a warm impartiality that makes it a highly useable text face for many kinds of projects. Djurek has managed to synthesize the beauty (and sluggishness) of old styles with the vitality and rigorousness of Moderns.

*From p. 70 of Noordzij&#039;s, The stroke: Theory of Writing, Hyphen Press 2005.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among this typeface&#8217;s most endearing qualities is its temperance. Djurek&#8217;s design is categorically Modern; the letterforms are brisk and resolute yet they maintain the subtle contrast associated with a broad-nib pen. As a distant student of the writing-centered perspective propagated by Gerrit Noordzij in the Hague, as well as his written account of pointed pen construction as being &#8216;altogether without orientation&#8217;*, I have tended to perceive the Modern style as frigid and undisciplined. Marlene sheds that acidulousness by exhibiting a warm impartiality that makes it a highly useable text face for many kinds of projects. Djurek has managed to synthesize the beauty (and sluggishness) of old styles with the vitality and rigorousness of Moderns.</p>
<p>*From p. 70 of Noordzij&#8217;s, The stroke: Theory of Writing, Hyphen Press 2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
