- 05.09.13
Library Subscriptions: The Future of Fonts? Shall We Sing or Cry?
Rudy: I think that you forgot one major question: Why would a type designer continue to develop type? Their part of the cake become… - 05.04.13
Roof Kerning in Amsterdam
Matijs van Zuijlen: So, does the current actual placement of the letters match the one in the artist's impression?… - 05.02.13
Instant
Hrant: Instant confuses me… The part of me that loves innovation gets happy looking at it, but the part of me that insists on sober … - 04.26.13
Krul
Tim: I love that a face so decorative is this legible. A very nice achievement.… - 04.16.13
Source Sans
Hrant: There's something I'd like to clear up, although it might essentially be merely a terminological issue: assuming it's true th… - 04.14.13
Roboto is a Four-headed Frankenfont
Christoph: Amazing! Thanks, Stephen. And the fun just never ends.… - 04.09.13
Comenia
Andrew Boardman: A beautiful and extremely usable "superfamily" that I hadn't considered previously. Thanks, Florian, as always.… - 04.09.13
Balkan Sans
Thomas Dang: Interesting concept but it's difficult to read and the kerning leaves something to be desired. I'm certain that it would not … - 04.07.13
The Elements of Typographic Style, Version 4.0
Craig Eliason: Thanks for this well considered and written review. For me, I never considered Bringhurst's book a bible. Among other quirks,… - 03.31.13
JAF Bernini Sans
Hrant: Thanks to Bill Dawson's piece on XK9 I just realized that Bernini is actually a brother-sister twin, with one being more rese… - 03.20.13
Our Favorite Typefaces of 2012
Stephen Coles: Nick Sherman raises good questions about quantity. I think it’s useful to have a discussion about what this list means and wh… - 03.19.13
Turnip
Hrant: I love Turnip, for the magical transformation it performs between display and text, and the wonder it injects into the craft … - 03.18.13
Quintet
Stephen Coles: It’s been over a year since I saw Quintet on the KABK class of 2011 site and I am still amazed by it. It was a monumental ach… - 03.18.13
Colvert
Hrant: I could opine that the Greek is particularly nice, but most of all I think the collective level of sensitive competence in Co… - 03.18.13
Garvis
Hrant: It was great to watch this design grow up, go to college, and get a job! James is a proud dad for sure.…
See also Bierut’s reaction to the new Xerox logo:
I wish I were dead.
Couldn’t have said it more concisely that that, but allow me to elaborate: I feel certain we’ll look back at this era in 20 years and talk about how bad it was for identity design. The same way we talk about what the ’70s-’80s did to architecture.
On the Xerox logo, Von Glitschka’s comment is worth seeing as well.
As someone who is lightly obsessed with Kubrick, I knew exactly what he was going to say, but he wasn’t obsessed with just one typeface. From an awesome interview with Jon Ronson, who visited Kubrick’s estate in 2001 (!):
Stephen – there were two related articles in The Atlantic this month, a Gary Hutswit interview and Playing to Type.
What did the 1970s and 1980s do to architecture — I think a lot of fantastic architecture got done in those decades that have had a lot of influence over today. From the rise of post-modernism, to naturist approach of brutalism and eco friendly architecture, to the experiments with ornament and shape that characterize the miami school. Sure run of the mill 1980s office buildings are not appreciated — yet. But there’s some fantastic run of the mill 1970s buildings that show the influence of the sublime where the materials (especially concrete) are allowed (and even designed to) weather.
The xerox logo is a step. Just like all the steps in the xerox ident over time. The last update (the alleged classic design) was only 13 years old — and even thus it looks vaguely 1980s.
how bad it was for identity design
I doubt the marbles will be considered representative of this era. Design history generally ignores the mainstream, documenting the “avante garde”, which is more accurately an ongoing “diversionary skirmish”, a parallel narrative of what the trade finds worthy, a consensus best represented by awards shows, and recorded in their annuals. Unless this kind of identity design wins awards, which seems unlikely, it will be relegated to a footnote.
Inaudible – I am speaking of architecture in general, just as I mean logo design in general.
Nick – I think you’re right, thankfully.
Thanks for posting this, Stephen. I’ve already e-mailed it to a couple of people!
Nick, maybe you’re right. The marbles would probably end up in the footnotes of history books.
But that’s assuming publishing and design history will remain the same: locked in this proprietary-design expert-driven-over-strategic-editorial-reviewed-and-expensive-printing paradigm.
Transparent, de-centralized and inexpensive ways of history writing are gaining ground, without necessarily loosing quality of content or “professionalism” – from blogs (like this one) to wikipedia, and glossy yet cheap DIY printing methods.
Maybe people who get their hands on this will have a great interest in mainstream “corporate” culture – visual, verbal or otherwise. People “love” this stuff. I’m thinking of projects like Corpoetics and books like No Logo, whether celebratory or critical.
Who knows what we’ll be writing about in the future, marbles included.