- 05.11.12
“Just My Type: A Book about Fonts”
Stephen Coles: As someone who played a small part in this book and even proofed some of the chapters (though not the more historical bits) i… - 05.02.12
Reina
Jackie: I purchased Breathe Pro from MyFonts, and thought that was one of the best I had ever seen, but this really is an exquisite w… - 04.29.12
My Favorite Font Sources: A Shortlist of Trusted Foundries and Retailers
Brittany Nutt: This was very useful. I never realized how many font websites there were. The one I only really new of was Dafont.com. This w… - 04.23.12
Interview: Phil Martin
Nick Shinn: … - 04.10.12
The Average Font
Luke Dorny: This is awesome! Stephen, I'm not sure that you intended it as such, but your brief review of the idea of new glyph overlays … - 04.06.12
Robothon 2012, RoboHint, and the Gerrit Noordzij Prize
Colin M. Ford: Great write up, Dan, and wonderful photos, Tânia!… - 04.03.12
Ain’t What ITC Used to Be
Si: … - 04.02.12
Neue Haas Grotesk
johsahaahr: They probably went with "Die Neue Haas ..." because "Die Sogar Neuer Helvetica" sounded a bit sensational! And then again we … - 03.29.12
Apple Color Emoji
Doug P: Great run down Si. I wasn't aware of the Emoji's tech background. I do remember watching them start coming online on Twitter …
See also Bierut’s reaction to the new Xerox logo:
I wish I were dead.
Couldn’t have said it more concisely that that, but allow me to elaborate: I feel certain we’ll look back at this era in 20 years and talk about how bad it was for identity design. The same way we talk about what the ’70s-’80s did to architecture.
On the Xerox logo, Von Glitschka’s comment is worth seeing as well.
As someone who is lightly obsessed with Kubrick, I knew exactly what he was going to say, but he wasn’t obsessed with just one typeface. From an awesome interview with Jon Ronson, who visited Kubrick’s estate in 2001 (!):
Stephen – there were two related articles in The Atlantic this month, a Gary Hutswit interview and Playing to Type.
What did the 1970s and 1980s do to architecture — I think a lot of fantastic architecture got done in those decades that have had a lot of influence over today. From the rise of post-modernism, to naturist approach of brutalism and eco friendly architecture, to the experiments with ornament and shape that characterize the miami school. Sure run of the mill 1980s office buildings are not appreciated — yet. But there’s some fantastic run of the mill 1970s buildings that show the influence of the sublime where the materials (especially concrete) are allowed (and even designed to) weather.
The xerox logo is a step. Just like all the steps in the xerox ident over time. The last update (the alleged classic design) was only 13 years old — and even thus it looks vaguely 1980s.
how bad it was for identity design
I doubt the marbles will be considered representative of this era. Design history generally ignores the mainstream, documenting the “avante garde”, which is more accurately an ongoing “diversionary skirmish”, a parallel narrative of what the trade finds worthy, a consensus best represented by awards shows, and recorded in their annuals. Unless this kind of identity design wins awards, which seems unlikely, it will be relegated to a footnote.
Inaudible – I am speaking of architecture in general, just as I mean logo design in general.
Nick – I think you’re right, thankfully.
Thanks for posting this, Stephen. I’ve already e-mailed it to a couple of people!
Nick, maybe you’re right. The marbles would probably end up in the footnotes of history books.
But that’s assuming publishing and design history will remain the same: locked in this proprietary-design expert-driven-over-strategic-editorial-reviewed-and-expensive-printing paradigm.
Transparent, de-centralized and inexpensive ways of history writing are gaining ground, without necessarily loosing quality of content or “professionalism” – from blogs (like this one) to wikipedia, and glossy yet cheap DIY printing methods.
Maybe people who get their hands on this will have a great interest in mainstream “corporate” culture – visual, verbal or otherwise. People “love” this stuff. I’m thinking of projects like Corpoetics and books like No Logo, whether celebratory or critical.
Who knows what we’ll be writing about in the future, marbles included.