Source Serif

Typeface Review

Source Serif

Reviewed by Carl Crossgrove on March 19, 2015

Source Serif is an ideal crystal goblet: not flashy or expressive, yet characterful, rich, and sturdy. Unlike earlier types meant to fit a utilitarian purpose, like Times New Roman or Century Schoolbook, Source Serif includes enough of the eclectic and quaint touches of its inspiration, Fournier, to keep a bit of flavor.

Available in several weights, the basic weight is pleasingly dark, which is satisfying from a simple usability standpoint, and also in comparison with Fournier impressions from the original metal. Texture and character are fiendishly challenging qualities to retain. Excessive, autotraced grime reads as “antiqued” when scaled to large sizes, whereas overly cleansed revivals always look somehow vacant, like bad taxidermy. A balance between the rumpled and the carefully crafted is not easy to achieve in such a cold, conceptual, and naked format as digital outlines.

Source Serif also uses the mixed vertical and diagonal stress of Fournier, with unexpected serifs, emphatic ball terminals and dots, and a comforting moderate contrast. The large counters of ‘e a g’, and large x-height, allow this face’s confident use in screen typography at any size, without those touches souring it for use at other sizes or for print. In fact, the very qualities that improve small print sizes are being recognized as useful for strong low-res typefaces as well.

Both Source Serif and Source Sans benefit from carefully modulated, slightly industrial proportions and a staid, utilitarian character; their proportions match, but their flavors are suited to each other as well. Neither is the showy partner, and neither is the cold, mechanical one. Typefaces intended for broad distribution can have a tiresome effect if they show too much artistic flavor. Palatino and Helvetica did not make for easy partners in any setting, whereas Georgia and Verdana were more agreeable, strengthened by their plainness and reliability over time and repeated exposure. The same can be said for Source Serif and Sans. They should be brought into wide service as utilitarian, but also personable, tools for digital communication.

Carl Crossgrove is a typeface designer with Monotype. His background in book arts, drawing, calligraphy and other hand work informs his type designs with humanism and craft. His typefaces include Biome, Beorcana, and Mundo Sans.

4 Comments

  1. I really enjoyed this write-up but I’m surprised that Source Serif’s lack of italics wasn’t mentioned. It looks like a great typeface but without italic styles it’s not really suited for setting body text.

  2. Frank Grießhammer says:

    Jeremiah, you are right. Nevertheless, I am very happy Carl reviewed Source Serif despite the lack of Italics (see, I used Italics there!). I am just as bothered by this shortcoming as anybody else, and I hope it won’t be long until that problem is history.

  3. Jakub Soos says:

    Hi Frank,
    Can you tell me, approx. when can I expect the release of italics? Is there any progress?

  4. James Lin says:

    Italics aren’t done yet, but Frank Grießhammer’s ongoing work on it is now public.

    https://github.com/frankrolf/source-serif-pro/tree/italic

Post a Comment

Comments at Typographica are moderated and copyedited, just like newspaper “Letters to the Editor”. Abusive or off-topic comments are not published. We appreciate compliments, but don’t publish them unless they add to the dialog. Thank you!